🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish laws and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread protest both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for additional consideration if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable debates in additional member states